This week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued 2 crypto giants, Coinbase and Binance, for violations of the securities laws. The Binance complaint alleges 13 violations, including failure to register as an exchange, broker-dealer, or clearing agency, the unregistered offers and sales of BNB (originally Binance Coin) and BUSD (Binance USD), the failure to restrict US investors from its platform, and misleading investors. The Coinbase complaint alleges the company failed to register as an exchange, broker-dealer, or clearing agency, and that the company’s staking service constitutes the unregistered offers and sales of securities. Underpinning these lawsuits is the SEC assertion that several digital assets are in fact securities, including Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Polygon (MATIC), Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos (ATOM), Algorand (ALGO), Near (NEAR), Internet Computer (ICP), and Axie Infinity (AXS). It is not our place to opine on the potential outcome of these or any other lawsuits, nor will we evaluate the merits of the arguments put forth. However, we feel strongly about the value and need for digital assets like bitcoin.
It is important to remember that we live in a disclosure-based regulatory regime, not a merit-based one. This means it is the job of regulators to make sure that appropriate disclosures are in place and information is available for investors to make decisions themselves. This was a point Chair Gensler reiterated in a recent speech. While many may find it hard to understand the point of “digital assets” like bitcoin when most assets are already digitized, a comment echoed by Chair Gensler in a recent CNBC interview, the fact that fiat currencies and stock certificate ownership also live in digital ledgers is missing the point of digital assets like bitcoin entirely.
Bitcoin has value because it is a digital asset and payment system outside of the traditional banking and payments system, one conducted on a peer-to-peer basis and controlled by the community of its users. Bitcoin’s users have, via their own free will, opted out of their traditional financial ecosystems and opted into a completely new one. What gives bitcoin value is its users, who demand the asset for any number of reasons. The fact that Bitcoin is digital is completely irrelevant but honestly makes it more similar to traditional investments than dissimilar.
The reasons that people own bitcoin the asset and use the Bitcoin network are varied. Maybe some like the fact that it has a fixed supply, it’s nearly infinitely divisible, or its transportability (just memorize your seed phrase). Others may like it because it is globally transmissible, cheaper to move (via Lightning) than fiat, it can be self custodied, or they expect it to rise in price in the future. And some may just like the logo or the color orange. While there are many reasons to like bitcoin, the point is we don’t begrudge others for their reasons.
For some people, though, a digital payment system like Bitcoin can be the difference between life and death, literally. Billions of people around the world live in authoritarian regimes, or in unsound monetary systems, or have an unreliable banking system. For those people, a technology like Bitcoin is a godsend, not something to be met with derision. Do you think those users care about 60% annual volatility when the alternative is the complete and utter eradication of wealth, either through direct confiscation or hyperinflation? The answer to that is a decisive “no.”
We understand that for many reading this, bitcoin might not mean the literal difference between life and death, but it may be financially. In the US and in many countries around the world, growing income and wealth disparity is becoming societally untenable. For the average American, the ability to provide a better (relative) future for their children is becoming increasingly difficult and a growing source of anxiety for many. Housing, education, health care, child care, and elder care are all becoming more expensive in real terms, making them less affordable for American families. For example, looking at the number of work hours required for the average worker to afford the median new and existing home is illuminating. This eliminates the effects of the “price of money” (inflation) and the secular trend of working fewer hours and ignores the “cost of money” (financing costs). The increase in “cost”, in terms of the number of hours required to work, for the price of a new home is up 75.1% since 1968 and up 81.6% for existing homes. That’s 2.9 more work years for a new home and 2.5 more work years for an existing home. That’s nearly 3 years that we cannot spend with our family and friends or enjoy hobbies and activities. And time is the one thing that cannot be created, regardless of how rich one becomes.
A 75% or 80% increase over 54 years only amounts to only a 1.0% - 1.1% increase annually, and therefore might be imperceptible over the short term. But over the long term, this amounts to a substantial loss of humanity’s most precious resource, time, just to afford a basic societal need, shelter. Why do housing, education, health care, child care, and elder care continue to suffer from these types of intractable trends, while things like electronics, apparel, and food cost less in real terms? A myriad of factors are likely at play, but from a high level, these sectors tend to not benefit greatly from globalization (someone somewhere else making it more cheaply) or technical innovation and efficiencies (making more with less). Historically, both of these factors have been important deflationary drivers, allowing us to get more for less.
It seems unlikely that sprinkling a digital asset like bitcoin on society is going to simply cure all its ills. Perhaps it corrects some of the distortions created by treating our national finances like a public dumping ground, a financial tragedy of the commons. However, bitcoin’s low correlations and high returns can affect the risk and return of portfolios today and hopefully, the financial outcomes of those who adopt it, so that they may not have to spend an increasing portion of their lives working to afford the basic necessities of it. In that respect, bitcoin investment would appear to have a lot of benefits, and we can think of no greater gift than giving families more time together, friends more opportunities to bond, and people to enjoy the things they love doing in this world, whatever that might be. In that sense, we think bitcoin has a lot of merit.
Bitcoin fell 1.2% on the week, an amazing feat given the news about Coinbase and Binance that came out over the week. At one point, bitcoin had clawed back nearly all of its losses sustained in the wake of the Binance announcement, a testament to how washed out the sentiment was for the asset. Equities continued to rally with both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite up 1.1%. Gold fell 0.7% on the week while oil rallied 1.7% on a pledge from Saudi Arabia to cut production. Bonds were mixed on the week with investment grade corporate bonds down 0.5%, high yield corporate bonds up 0.7%, and long-term US Treasuries down 1.0%.
SEC Files 13 Charges Against Binance Entities and Founder - SEC
SEC Files Motion for Restraining Order to Freeze Binance US Assets - Reuters
SEC Chair Gensler Doubts the Need for More Digital Currency - CNBC
Show Cause Order Issued to Coinbase - Alabama Securities Commission
The SEC Comes for Crypto - Bloomberg
When Is a Token Not a Security? - Bloomberg
Binance Appears to Have Lied to Lawmakers, Elizabeth Warren Says - Bloomberg
Russian Nationals Charged With Hacking One Cryptocurrency Exchange and Illicitly Operating Another - Department of Justice
Robinhood Ends Support for Solana, Polygon, Cardano - The Block
Coinbase Lawsuit May Finally Send Crypto Debate to Supreme Court - Bloomberg
Retail Demand to Remain Strong Ahead of 2024 Halving: JPMorgan - CoinDesk
Bitcoin Developers Feud Over Ending Ordinals Memecoin Frenzy - Bloomberg
Binance’s Richard Teng Emerges as CZ’s Heir Apparent - Bloomberg
Binance Hands Rising Star Richard Teng Key Position to Replace CZ - CoinDesk
Crypto Custodian Zodia to Offer Staking With Blockdaemon - CoinDesk
Genesis Bankruptcy Judge Extends Mediation Period - CoinDesk
Lightning Data Firm Launches New ‘Liner’ Index for Bitcoin Yield - CoinDesk
How Amboss is Shaping a More Inclusive Future for Finance - Amboss
Circle Names Heath Tarbert Chief Legal Officer & Head of Corporate Affairs - Circle
Binance.US to Halt Dollar Deposits After SEC Crackdown - Reuters
June 13 - CPI reading
June 14 - FOMC rate decision
June 30 - CME expiry
This report has been prepared solely for informational purposes and does not represent investment advice or provide an opinion regarding the fairness of any transaction to any and all parties nor does it constitute an offer, solicitation or a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security or instrument or to adopt any investment strategy. Charts and graphs provided herein are for illustrative purposes only. This report does not represent valuation judgments with respect to any financial instrument, issuer, security or sector that may be described or referenced herein and does not represent a formal or official view of New York Digital Investment Group or its affiliates (collectively NYDIG).
It should not be assumed that NYDIG will make investment recommendations in the future that are consistent with the views expressed herein, or use any or all of the techniques or methods of analysis described herein. NYDIG may have positions (long or short) or engage in securities transactions that are not consistent with the information and views expressed in this report.
The information provided herein is valid only for the purpose stated herein and as of the date hereof (or such other date as may be indicated herein) and no undertaking has been made to update the information, which may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The information in this report may contain forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. NYDIG neither assumes any duty to nor undertakes to update any forward-looking statements. There is no assurance that any forward-looking events or targets will be achieved, and actual outcomes may be significantly different from those shown herein. The information in this report, including statements concerning financial market trends, is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.
Information furnished by others, upon which all or portions of this report are based, are from sources believed to be reliable. However, NYDIG makes no representation as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information and has accepted the information without further verification. No warranty is given as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information. No responsibility is taken for changes in market conditions or laws or regulations and no obligation is assumed to revise this report to reflect changes, events or conditions that occur subsequent to the date hereof.
Nothing contained herein constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Legal advice can only be provided by legal counsel. NYDIG shall have no liability to any third party in respect of this report or any actions taken or decisions made as a consequence of the information set forth herein. By accessing this report, the recipient acknowledges its understanding and acceptance of the foregoing terms.